Agile

Ready For Sprint?

5
Ready for Sprint?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/robert_voors/767796301/

Have you ever been sitting in a sprint planning and heard the following sentences:

  • “Can we split this user story and at least start with the GUI?”
  • “I’m not sure if the hardware will be available on time to integrate this story but we could use an emulator instead.”
  • “There are no wire frames yet, but we could start with the back-end.”
  • “The acceptance criteria are still quite vague, but I think I know what the customer needs.”
  • etc.

Does some of these sentences sound familiar? I observed these conversations several times in the past. All of these quotes are based on the same problem: The user story is simply not ready for the next sprint. Still, some teams pull these user stories into there next sprint to implement at least a part of it, to make the PO happy. Stop it! It doesn’t make sense at all. None of these user stories will be done at the end of the sprint, because important parts are missing. These teams have to be reminded that every user story has to be implemented, tested, integrated, documented and shall deliver value to the end user. If you already know at the start of a new sprint, that you won’t be able to finalize a user story: ditch it!

But what can you do to avoid these discussions? There is a simple solution: Introduce the “Definition of Ready” (DoR)! The DoR defines, when a user story is ready for a sprint. If it doesn’t comply with this definition it will be ignored in the next sprint planning. As the “Definition of Done”, the DoR is defined by the team itself and therefore varies from team to team. If you’re e.g. developing a web application, hardware may be not that important for your team, but if you’re developing software for e.g. a medical device it is could be important. Sit together with your team and your PO and define what the DoR has to contain in your current situation. Agree, only to pull those stories into your sprint, that are ready for sprint.

Most agile teams I know implement a DoD, but the DoR is still only rarely used. I hope this will change in the future. Don’t waste your time implementing half-baked user stories. You can use your time better than that.

What are your experiences? Leave a comment!

An agile cloze

1
Cloze

http://www.flickr.com/photos/monkeyminddesign/4553428118/

I was just inspired by an german christmas cloze. It even inspired me so much, that I decided to write an agile cloze and let you fill the missing pieces :) So, here you are.

The best way _____________________.

Scrum is ______________ but XP _________________ with or without Kanban.

I currently read ______________ and think _____________.

___________ is the best thing that happened to our company because ____________.

Would you believe _______________.

_____________________ awesome.

If ______________ the world would be a better place.

Happy __________________.

You can either leave a comment or create a blog post based on the above cloze. I’m looking forward to your “fill-in” :)

Penitence For The 7 Agile Sins

2
Penitence

http://www.flickr.com/photos/21561428@N03/3734800195/

Half a year ago I wrote a blog post about 7 Agile Sins. As I’m sure, that I’m not the only one who is guilty for one or more of these sins, I collected a list of possible ways to show penitence and to do it better next time :) So here is my list of the sins and their appropriate penitence.

Stop learning

The first way for showing penitence is to help to create a learning environment in your company. One possibility to do this is to introduce so called brown bags. This is at least one corner stone to foster learning and bring new ideas in your working environment.

Don’t listen

Listening is a fading skill in our society. Most men know at least one situation where their girlfriend shouts at them, because they didn’t carefully listen. But hey, there is help underway. Listening is a skill you can learn. There are a lot of great books out there on how to become a better listener. One of them is “The Art of Active Listening“. It’s a quite short one and a good starting point to improve your listening skills.

I also recommend listening to the TED talk of Julian Treasure “5 Ways of Listen Better”. One of the things I found valuable is the acronym “RASA”. It’s the Sanskrit word for essence. The single characters have the following meaning:

  • Receive
  • Appriciate
  • Summarize
  • Ask

If you keep this acronym in mind during your next conversations, it will help you to get a better listener. So one way to show penitence for this not listening is to learn to listen.

Stop thinking

This is simple. Start thinking! I know, the guys behind XP, Scrum and Kanban are keen thinkers. But you know what: They don’t know your context. So, before you blindly follow “the book”, try to understand WHY you are doing these practises. Show your penitence by doing the following: Map each of the practises you use to one or more agile values and principles. This will be the first step on your journey to understand the theory behind the agile frameworks.

Be dogmatic

Your penance for this sin is to look beyond your own nose. There are still agilists out there who believe, that there were no successful projects before agile frameworks came in. Fortunately this isn’t true. There are a lot of successful “waterfall” and V-model based projects that were successful. And there was one entity that collected best practises and created a book out of them. So your lesson to show penitence for this sin, is to read the PMBOK (Project Management Body Of Knowledge). I’m sure, even as hardcore agilist you’ll find some valuable things in this book.

Ignore the agile values and principles

There is a great exercise described in the book “Coaching Agile Teams” by Lyssa Adkins name the “High Performance Tree”. Lyssa also created a short Youtube Video where she describes how to create such a tree. This tree has many functions. One of them is to use it as part of a retrospective. You can ask questions like “Why did x happen last sprint? Where were our roots weak?” or “On what of our high performance traits do we want to work in our next sprint?”. As the tree should be placed on one of the team’s walls, it is always visible and part of the team’s daily business. To make a long story short, your exercise to show penitence for ignoring the agile values and principles, is to draw a “High Performance Tree” together with your team, put it on you team’s wall and use it in your next retrospective.

Misuse the agile toolkit

I’m sorry but for this sin there is only one way to show penitence: Go get a priest. In our case this means to get help from an experienced coach. I have this opinion because IMHO this happens especially in inexperienced teams. I had teams that were only “trained” by reading the Wikipedia entry on Scrum. It’s quite clear that there are some misunderstandings in the beginning. But also other teams benefit from an experienced coach, who will help them to understand how to use the agile toolkit correctly.

Ignore the transparency

IMHO this is most deadly sin of all. There is a simple way to overcome this sin: Be even more transparent! Don’t put your backlogs and boards into an electronic tool. Make it visible. Put it on the walls, but not only in the team’s room, also on the floor or near the management’s offices. In one of my last projects we used a so called “master board” to foster the “Scrum of Scrum” meeting every morning.

Masterboard

Masterboard for 5 Scrum teams

 

Each row represents a team and the cards on the board only show on what the teams are working on User Story level. This really helped us to get the big picture of the whole project. Additionally we introduced a dashboard to show the project status using “traffic lights”.

Dashboard

Dashboard for the management team

In the upper left corner we showed the overall status for every planned release. All open issues were shown on the right upper corner. The left lower corner was used to show on what epics the teams are currently working on and last but not least, the lower right corner showed the already delivers epics. This way we were able to completely remove all status reports. Now the management was able to get the status on one single view. One way to show penitence for ignoring the transparency of your team would be to introduce a master board for your Scrum of Scrum meetings.

I hope you like one or more of my suggestions to show your penitence. I’m looking forward to your comments!

10 things to mess up your retrospective

4
Retrospective

http://www.flickr.com/photos/metabolico/583204694/

It’s about time for a new list. Today, I decided to write a list on how to mess up your retrospective. There are a lot of possibilities to do this and the following tips will help you doing so ;)

1 – don’t prepare anything

As the retrospective is the simplest and least important meeting of all Scrum meetings, it doesn’t need any preparation. Just come together and start. Wait, where are the pens and the post-its? Forget about it! Just sit together and chat a bit.

2 – Start immediately

As there is no need to set the stage, start immediately with gathering data. Immediately start the retrospective with asking the two questions: “What went wrong?” and “What went well”. That should be sufficient to get great results.

3 – Don’t check if the tasks of the last Retro were done

We don’t care about the old crap from the last retrospective. If it was important enough, it will make it again to our retrospective results. And again, and again, and again, and again….

4 – don’t use post its

Post Its are evil! Endless trees have to die to create this evildoing. You have silent and introvert people in your team? Then maybe it is time for them to learn to speak up. It also helps to reduce all of this retrospective waste, with all of these things that can’t be solved anyway.

5 – Forget about the Insight

Insight? Isn’t it clear why you failed in your last sprint? Maybe you should also skip the “Gather data” step and instantly start to “Decide what to do”.

6 – No DUE date

Due dates are for waterfallers. As we’re working in an agile environment, we don’t need any due dates.

7 – no responsible

Repeat after me: “We’re no waterfallers”. A responsible person is a concept from the stone age. We as a team will make sure that the task will be done.

8 – No time box

This whole concept of a time box is exhausting, isn’t it? Can’t we just skip it for the retrospective? Just sit together and talk and for sure we will have something valuable in the ehh, when it is over, eventually…

9 – try to solve everything

You collected a big list of issues? Then you should try to solve all of them. It can’t be that you ignore some of the problems of the last sprint. Define a task for each identified impediment or problem and solve it in the next sprint.

10 – Always use the same scheme

Always ask the same questions and do the same exercises in all of your retrospectives. This will create a comfy environment for your team and you ensure that you’ll always have a energized and creative team. Your retrospective results will be awesome. Ignore all of this fancy new methods to facilitate a retrospective. This is all new age shit.

I’m looking forward to your experiences, when trying these things out. Please leave a comment :)

5 Reasons Why a Product Owner Team Might Be a Good Idea

17
Teamwork

http://www.flickr.com/photos/yckhong/363310776/

During this week I read an interesting article called “Is Scrum a –ism that doesn’t work for real?“. One of the things that @marcusoftnet mentioned in his article was this:

The product owner is an unicorn

I continue to read and had to agree with him in many points. The rest of the week I kept thinking about this and came to the conclusion that in some environments a product owner team would be a better fit. But what could be a good reason for a product owner team?

1 – Responsibility

One good reason might be a shared responsibility. In some companies it seems to be difficult to define THE one and only PO with all needed responsibilities. Even worse, I saw product owners, whose decisions were overruled by their bosses and managers. This does not only have a demotivating effect on the PO, but also the development team becomes insecure when working with her. When you have a PO team, it is much more difficult to overrule them.

2 – Diversity

Another good reason for the team approach is the diversity you get when you have a team. My ideal PO team consists of a product manager, one person from marketing, one from UX and a techie. That way you have all needed knowledge in the team to create an awesome backlog. I saw a lot of bad POs who were unable to create a good backlog, because he missed some knowledge in an important area e.g the market or technical know how. This will all vanish if you have a PO team.

3 – Availability

Ever heard about ScrumMasters taking over the role of the PO, when he is not available? Bad idea! But it does happen and not only once. This is another good reason for a PO team. Even if one or two members of the team are not available (ill, on vacation), the team is still able to work. No availability issues anymore.

4 – Teamwork

A good backlog is the result of great teamwork. I never saw a backlog that was created by a single person and still was in a good shape. I know that there are no rules that the PO should be the only person to create new items in a backlog, but many teams think so. A PO team forces them to work together. Of course they still have to work tightly with the development team, do backlog grooming sessions or even ask a developer to help to maintain the backlog. A PO team will help to foster the collaboration in a team.

5 – Fun

Last but not least, working in a team is much more fun. I know this should be also the case if you have a single PO, but I never saw a PO that sat in the same office or even floor than the development team. I even saw POs that were not only sitting in the same office but at a completely different location. With a PO team you force them to work at the same location and I swear it is much more fun to work this way.

What do you think? What are your experiences with POs? Do you also think that the role of the PO is a unicorn? I’m looking forward to your comments.

UPDATE:

Thanks to @maritzavdh here are some links for further reading:

Go to Top