scrumphony
This user hasn't shared any profile information
Posts by scrumphony
Penitence For The 7 Agile Sins
2Half a year ago I wrote a blog post about 7 Agile Sins. As I’m sure, that I’m not the only one who is guilty for one or more of these sins, I collected a list of possible ways to show penitence and to do it better next time
So here is my list of the sins and their appropriate penitence.
Stop learning
The first way for showing penitence is to help to create a learning environment in your company. One possibility to do this is to introduce so called brown bags. This is at least one corner stone to foster learning and bring new ideas in your working environment.
Don’t listen
Listening is a fading skill in our society. Most men know at least one situation where their girlfriend shouts at them, because they didn’t carefully listen. But hey, there is help underway. Listening is a skill you can learn. There are a lot of great books out there on how to become a better listener. One of them is “The Art of Active Listening“. It’s a quite short one and a good starting point to improve your listening skills.
I also recommend listening to the TED talk of Julian Treasure “5 Ways of Listen Better”. One of the things I found valuable is the acronym “RASA”. It’s the Sanskrit word for essence. The single characters have the following meaning:
- Receive
- Appriciate
- Summarize
- Ask
If you keep this acronym in mind during your next conversations, it will help you to get a better listener. So one way to show penitence for this not listening is to learn to listen.
Stop thinking
This is simple. Start thinking! I know, the guys behind XP, Scrum and Kanban are keen thinkers. But you know what: They don’t know your context. So, before you blindly follow “the book”, try to understand WHY you are doing these practises. Show your penitence by doing the following: Map each of the practises you use to one or more agile values and principles. This will be the first step on your journey to understand the theory behind the agile frameworks.
Be dogmatic
Your penance for this sin is to look beyond your own nose. There are still agilists out there who believe, that there were no successful projects before agile frameworks came in. Fortunately this isn’t true. There are a lot of successful “waterfall” and V-model based projects that were successful. And there was one entity that collected best practises and created a book out of them. So your lesson to show penitence for this sin, is to read the PMBOK (Project Management Body Of Knowledge). I’m sure, even as hardcore agilist you’ll find some valuable things in this book.
Ignore the agile values and principles
There is a great exercise described in the book “Coaching Agile Teams” by Lyssa Adkins name the “High Performance Tree”. Lyssa also created a short Youtube Video where she describes how to create such a tree. This tree has many functions. One of them is to use it as part of a retrospective. You can ask questions like “Why did x happen last sprint? Where were our roots weak?” or “On what of our high performance traits do we want to work in our next sprint?”. As the tree should be placed on one of the team’s walls, it is always visible and part of the team’s daily business. To make a long story short, your exercise to show penitence for ignoring the agile values and principles, is to draw a “High Performance Tree” together with your team, put it on you team’s wall and use it in your next retrospective.
Misuse the agile toolkit
I’m sorry but for this sin there is only one way to show penitence: Go get a priest. In our case this means to get help from an experienced coach. I have this opinion because IMHO this happens especially in inexperienced teams. I had teams that were only “trained” by reading the Wikipedia entry on Scrum. It’s quite clear that there are some misunderstandings in the beginning. But also other teams benefit from an experienced coach, who will help them to understand how to use the agile toolkit correctly.
Ignore the transparency
IMHO this is most deadly sin of all. There is a simple way to overcome this sin: Be even more transparent! Don’t put your backlogs and boards into an electronic tool. Make it visible. Put it on the walls, but not only in the team’s room, also on the floor or near the management’s offices. In one of my last projects we used a so called “master board” to foster the “Scrum of Scrum” meeting every morning.
Each row represents a team and the cards on the board only show on what the teams are working on User Story level. This really helped us to get the big picture of the whole project. Additionally we introduced a dashboard to show the project status using “traffic lights”.
In the upper left corner we showed the overall status for every planned release. All open issues were shown on the right upper corner. The left lower corner was used to show on what epics the teams are currently working on and last but not least, the lower right corner showed the already delivers epics. This way we were able to completely remove all status reports. Now the management was able to get the status on one single view. One way to show penitence for ignoring the transparency of your team would be to introduce a master board for your Scrum of Scrum meetings.
I hope you like one or more of my suggestions to show your penitence. I’m looking forward to your comments!
Food for Though #12: Dogma sucks
1Dogma is the established belief or doctrine held by a religion, or a particular group or organization. It is authoritative and not to be disputed, doubted, or diverged from, by the practitioners or believers. Although it generally refers to religious beliefs that are accepted without reason or evidence, they can refer to acceptable opinions of philosophers or philosophical schools, public decrees, or issued decisions of political authorities. The term derives from Greek δόγμα “that which seems to one, opinion or belief”and that from δοκέω (dokeo), “to think, to suppose, to imagine”. Dogma came to signify laws or ordinances adjudged and imposed upon others by the First Century. The plural is either dogmas or dogmata , from Greek δόγματα. (Source: Wikipedia)
Dogmatism is a wide spread bad habit in our industry. You can find it nearly everywhere. There are the vi dogmatists against the Emacs dogmatists. The C dogmatists against the C++ dogmatists. The Java dogmatists against the C# or C++ dogmatists and also the agile dogmatists against the rest. IMHO dogmatism sucks. It does not only suck once it always sucks. Dogmatism blocks progress and impedes yourself to look beyond your own nose. It does not help to bang your head against a wall a thousand time, just because this is part of your dogmatic believe. It’s not always true that your Scrum implementation failed because you did it wrong. There are a lot of cases, where a plain Scrum implementation won’t work in your environment, in your context. In such cases, it doesn’t make sense to increase the number of prayers to your Scrum god. It won’t help you. The only thing that helps now, is to stop being dogmatic and look beyond your own nose. There are a lot of interesting practises also from other “religions”. Even the evil god of “waterfalls” had some good ideas.
But dogmatism also blocks your self development. There a people who are dogmatic about there belief that they can’t sing, dance, write, coach, code, learn an instrument, you name it. In some rare cases this may be true, but in most cases this is bullshit. The human being is an awesome creature that can do the impossible. One first step could be, to leave your dogma behind you. Let’s try it out and leave a comment about your experiences.
5 Reasons Why a Product Owner Team Might Be a Good Idea
17During this week I read an interesting article called “Is Scrum a –ism that doesn’t work for real?“. One of the things that @marcusoftnet mentioned in his article was this:
The product owner is an unicorn
I continue to read and had to agree with him in many points. The rest of the week I kept thinking about this and came to the conclusion that in some environments a product owner team would be a better fit. But what could be a good reason for a product owner team?
1 – Responsibility
One good reason might be a shared responsibility. In some companies it seems to be difficult to define THE one and only PO with all needed responsibilities. Even worse, I saw product owners, whose decisions were overruled by their bosses and managers. This does not only have a demotivating effect on the PO, but also the development team becomes insecure when working with her. When you have a PO team, it is much more difficult to overrule them.
2 – Diversity
Another good reason for the team approach is the diversity you get when you have a team. My ideal PO team consists of a product manager, one person from marketing, one from UX and a techie. That way you have all needed knowledge in the team to create an awesome backlog. I saw a lot of bad POs who were unable to create a good backlog, because he missed some knowledge in an important area e.g the market or technical know how. This will all vanish if you have a PO team.
3 – Availability
Ever heard about ScrumMasters taking over the role of the PO, when he is not available? Bad idea! But it does happen and not only once. This is another good reason for a PO team. Even if one or two members of the team are not available (ill, on vacation), the team is still able to work. No availability issues anymore.
4 – Teamwork
A good backlog is the result of great teamwork. I never saw a backlog that was created by a single person and still was in a good shape. I know that there are no rules that the PO should be the only person to create new items in a backlog, but many teams think so. A PO team forces them to work together. Of course they still have to work tightly with the development team, do backlog grooming sessions or even ask a developer to help to maintain the backlog. A PO team will help to foster the collaboration in a team.
5 – Fun
Last but not least, working in a team is much more fun. I know this should be also the case if you have a single PO, but I never saw a PO that sat in the same office or even floor than the development team. I even saw POs that were not only sitting in the same office but at a completely different location. With a PO team you force them to work at the same location and I swear it is much more fun to work this way.
What do you think? What are your experiences with POs? Do you also think that the role of the PO is a unicorn? I’m looking forward to your comments.
UPDATE:
Thanks to @maritzavdh here are some links for further reading:












Recent comments